A practical guide to watchlist-derived trigger-price review in TEMIRIN using configured records, explicit market identity, current controls, and human review.
July 27, 2026 · 6 min read
A Polymarket opportunity radar is a workspace view of markets the user deliberately placed on a watchlist. TEMIRIN creates review records from that configured set and shows the coverage the workspace actually owns. This definition makes the value clear: one place to connect known market identity, stored evidence, price history, policy state, alert operations, decisions, and paper records for a repeatable human review.
Start by reviewing the watchlist itself. For each market, verify the public market ID, exact question, outcome side, closing condition, and resolution source. Remove resolved or mistakenly configured entries through the normal user workflow while retaining historical records that already refer to them. A smaller watchlist with accountable reasons can be more useful than broad coverage. TEMIRIN does not infer which other markets might be related, so users decide what enters or leaves the monitored set.
Configure RSS and public HTTPS web sources that publish facts relevant to the watchlist. Provider-configured Telegram and X readers can add source records where those connections are available. Each item should preserve publisher or provider identity, canonical URL or reference, observed time, supplied publication or event time when present, and safe ingestion state. Canonicalization and content deduplication reduce repeated web material, but neither operation judges whether the underlying claim is correct.
Evidence appears beside a radar record only when a supported explicit market identifier is supplied. If a source item lacks the identifier, it remains in source context until a user changes the configuration. Once linked, a deterministic brief can organize stored fields while the reviewer opens the canonical source, verifies the market identity, checks the precise claim, and records any uncertainty or correction.
When TEMIRIN first creates the watchlist-derived record, it preserves the observed market price as a trigger reference. A later sync updates a separate current-price value and timestamp without replacing the original. This two-point history lets the team ask what public context existed when the review started and what changed afterward. The trigger is not a recommended entry, a reserved quote, or a claim that evidence caused market movement; it is a stored observation.
Inspect public bid, ask, spread, and visible depth when available. A midpoint between a wide bid and ask can create a misleading impression of precision, and shallow displayed quantity may not support a hypothetical size. Reviewers can note book conditions in their reasoning, while implemented policy and paper-order checks remain separately labeled. The paper record keeps its simulated price, notional, timestamp, and policy result distinct from public order-book observations.
The record can show a current stake cap, source and category enabled or blocked state, source or category maximum-stake overrides, free-capital percentage, price-move guard, and kill switch. Display the policy reason that applies so a reviewer understands why a record is eligible or blocked. Alongside the user-entered notional checks, these fields are explicit workspace constraints around review and simulation.
If a user submits an authenticated approve or reject action after the price has moved beyond the configured guard, the endpoint can block that decision. The correct next step is renewed human inspection using current context. Preserve both the attempted action and the changed price state in audit history. This fail-closed behavior keeps the saved context and current observation visibly separate.
Alert rules can route selected radar context through configured email, Telegram, Slack, or outbound webhook destinations. Each external attempt belongs in a delivery ledger, where operators can inspect success or failure and manually retry when appropriate. A successful response proves transport only. It does not acknowledge a task, record an approval, or create a simulation. Provider-configured Telegram or X source readers are also distinct from these outbound destinations, even when a provider name appears in both workflows.
Approve and reject remain authenticated in-app records with workspace access controls. A paper order is another deliberate user action, stored separately and labeled as simulation. Current server checks cover per-order notional, rolling twenty-four-hour notional, per-market exposure, and portfolio concentration. Passing them allows the paper record to be saved under current rules; it does not suggest the notional, transmit an order, or authorize use of a public wallet. TEMIRIN never needs a private key for this workflow.
Use journal notes to preserve the reviewer’s original thesis, evidence, uncertainty, disposition, and later lesson. Include records that were rejected, blocked, left untouched, or followed by unfavorable paper marks. Compare trigger-to-current movement, user-entered paper results, and read-only public-wallet snapshots as separate measures with their own timestamps and sample counts. Combining them into one performance number would blur simulations, public observations, and outside activity and could imply returns TEMIRIN did not produce.
Journal analytics and export can help teams inspect source coverage, alert reliability, decision consistency, policy blocks, and paper behavior over a defined period. Improvements might include correcting a market ID, updating a source URL, changing an alert destination, or clarifying a review checklist. None guarantees better financial outcomes. The radar earns trust by making a bounded current workflow easier to understand while users retain responsibility for facts, eligibility, capital, and every actual Polymarket transaction.
A daily operating pass can be brief and reproducible. Check failed source reads, inspect newly stored evidence, review markets with material trigger-to-current movement, confirm policy blocks, examine failed alert attempts, and assign a person to records chosen for deeper review. End by recording dispositions and any separate paper simulations. This sequence does not need automatic task progression to be valuable; its strength comes from named records, visible clocks, accountable decisions, and an audit history another workspace member can follow.
Practice one degraded case as well as the normal path. Use a safe test record to observe how a stale price, unavailable source, blocked policy state, or failed destination appears, then verify that the workspace does not silently replace missing context. Confirm that manual retry affects only the chosen alert attempt and that refreshed market context does not overwrite the trigger reference. Operational rehearsal turns the radar from a collection of cards into a process the team can support without expanding its authority.
Keep a short handoff note when responsibility changes during an active review. Include the opportunity ID, reason for attention, last verified source, price freshness, current policy result, and unresolved question. The receiving reviewer should reopen those records rather than accept the note as evidence. This practice reduces duplicated work while preserving the distinction between a teammate’s summary and the canonical material stored in the workspace.
No. Its records come from markets users configured in the workspace watchlist. Coverage is deliberately bounded and visible.
It is the first public price stored when the record was created. It is historical context, not a recommendation or executable quote.
Evidence needs a supported explicit market identifier, which the reviewer verifies against the exact market question and outcome.
No. External channels deliver context only. Decisions and user-created paper orders are separate authenticated workspace actions.
No. The radar provides research context and cannot authorize an order. Controlled LIVE is a separate non-custodial path that requires an eligible user’s exact-order review, provider-required signed authorization, and fresh fail-closed server checks.
