A practical guide to a repeatable Polymarket research workflow in TEMIRIN using configured records, explicit market identity, current controls, and human review.
July 12, 2026 · 4 min read
A repeatable Polymarket research workflow starts with the contract, not with a broad headline. Open the configured market and record its market ID, outcome side, exact question, close time, and resolution source. Write the research question in terms that can be checked against those rules. This prevents a useful source about the general topic from being treated as decisive evidence for a different threshold, date, or outcome.
Define what would change the review before collecting more material. A short note can name the relevant claim, the uncertainty that remains, and the primary source most likely to resolve it. TEMIRIN provides the workspace record and audit trail for that process; the reviewer supplies the interpretation. Keeping the question narrow makes later evidence comparison clearer and reduces duplicated investigation across the team.
Configured RSS and HTTPS readers retain canonical URLs, observation times, available publication times, stored content, freshness, and collection state. Provider-configured X and Telegram readers keep their own references where available. Review the originating record before relying on a brief. A deterministic brief organizes stored reliability, relevance, direction, freshness, and tags, but its value comes from the inspectable fields and source trail beneath it.
Treat canonicalization and deduplication as record hygiene. Repeated copies of one release should remain traceable to their origin rather than being counted as independent support. A correction at the same URL should retain its later observation time and an attributable note. Source health answers whether collection worked; the reviewer still evaluates whether the content is relevant to the configured market and its resolution rules.
Evidence appears beside a watchlist market only when the stored item carries a supported explicit market identifier. Verify that identifier against the contract before using the item in a decision note. If a source record has no link, keep it in source context until a person supplies the correct market ID. An honest unlinked state is more useful than a confident association that cannot be reproduced.
For multiple records linked to one market, build a compact evidence table with source identity, observed claim, publication or event time, freshness, and reviewer note. Preserve disagreement instead of flattening it into one conclusion. The same record can be relevant for different reasons at different times, so later comments should be appended with an author and timestamp while the original source fields remain unchanged.
Preserve the first recorded market price as the trigger reference and display the latest synchronized price with a separate observation time. Public bid, ask, spread, and visible depth can explain the market state a reviewer saw, but they do not alter the source record. A changed price should prompt the user to revisit the thesis and note what changed rather than silently updating the original research context.
A configured public wallet contributes read-only positions, PnL, and concentration with its own timestamp. Current policy can display stake cap, source and category state, max-stake and minimum-confidence overrides, free-capital percentage, price-move guard, and kill switch. Keep wallet observations, policy reasons, and evidence assessment in distinct fields so a reader understands which record supplied each part of the review.
After inspecting the evidence and current context, the user can record approve or reject in the authenticated application with an actor and timestamp. The configured price-move guard belongs to that decision step. A paper order is created separately with a user-entered side, price, and notional. Its server checks cover per-order notional, rolling twenty-four-hour notional, per-market exposure, and portfolio concentration.
Finish with a journal entry that captures the thesis, uncertainty, invalidation condition, linked evidence IDs, decision, and next review point. Later analytics can compare accepted, rejected, blocked, and no-action records when the original timestamps and sample sizes remain visible. Export a bounded set and trace a sample back to the workspace. That routine turns research into a process another teammate can inspect and repeat.
The workflow uses configured RSS, web, or provider records, stored observation times, explicit market references, trigger and current prices, human notes, and the audit history available in the workspace.
The record must carry an explicit market ID for a market already configured in the workspace. Unlinked evidence can remain in research until a person assigns the correct market and checks the resolution wording.
TEMIRIN preserves the original trigger reference and stores the later synchronized price with its own observation time. The reviewer sees both values and decides whether the changed context affects the note.
Human notes and corrections retain their author and time in the audit history. The revised record can clarify the current view without erasing the evidence, market reference, or earlier review state.
