A practical guide to manual prioritization of watchlist review in TEMIRIN using configured records, explicit market identity, current controls, and human review.
August 3, 2026 · 5 min read
A Polymarket review queue is a workload list, not a list of trades. Its records come from markets already configured in the workspace watchlist. Before ordering the list, decide which operational questions matter today: which evidence is newly observed, which market price changed since its trigger, which policy state blocks review, and which public-wallet exposure makes a market important to inspect. These criteria help allocate reviewer attention without predicting an outcome or suggesting an amount.
Keep admission into the queue separate from prioritization. TEMIRIN does not scan every venue market or infer relationships from arbitrary source text. Evidence appears beside a watchlist-derived record only through a supported explicit market identifier. A missing record may mean the market was not configured or the evidence was not linked, not that the system judged it unimportant. Document coverage boundaries before using queue statistics in a team review.
Freshness needs more than one clock. Compare the source’s supplied publication or event time when present, TEMIRIN’s observation time, the opportunity trigger time, the current-price observation time, and the latest alert attempt. A recent alert can point to old evidence, while a recent article can describe an older event. Display the labels instead of collapsing them into a single age. The reviewer can then decide whether the record is timely for the market’s closing condition.
When a configured reader fails, expose the stale or unavailable state rather than treating the last successful record as current. Canonicalization and deduplication prevent repeated RSS or web items from crowding the queue, but a duplicate status is an ingestion fact, not a quality judgment. Provider-configured Telegram and X readers may expose different event references. Keep those origins visible so reviewers understand what each timestamp represents and can investigate the correct source.
Place the preserved trigger price beside the current public price and calculate the observed difference only as review context. Large movement may deserve faster inspection because earlier assumptions could be stale, not because reversal or continuation is likely. When available, bid, ask, spread, and visible depth help distinguish a stable book from a thin display. They are public observations rather than enforced liquidity rules, executable quotes, or proof that a particular stake could trade.
A configured public wallet can supply read-only snapshots, positions, PnL context, and concentration context. Use the snapshot time and market identity to identify records connected to meaningful visible exposure. Do not infer the wallet owner’s intent, unseen hedges, complete cost basis, or future action. Paper records belong in a separate ledger. Mixing public-wallet positions with simulations would make the queue look more comprehensive while obscuring which risk is observed and which is hypothetical.
Current workspace policy can expose a stake cap, source and category enabled or blocked states, source or category maximum-stake overrides, a free-capital percentage, price-move guard, and kill switch. Show the stored reason when a record is ineligible rather than hiding it at the bottom of the queue. User-entered paper orders also receive per-order, rolling twenty-four-hour, per-market exposure, and portfolio concentration checks.
An in-app approve or reject event has its own actor and time. If current price has moved beyond the configured guard, the authenticated decision can be blocked and should return to human review. An email, Telegram, Slack, or webhook attempt remains transport history only. External destinations cannot acknowledge the queue item or change its decision status.
Assign a reviewer to each selected record and write a short reason such as source freshness, material price change, policy block, or visible portfolio concentration. Ownership and notes are human operating practices, not timers enforced by TEMIRIN. Record a disposition in the workspace, then create a separate paper order only if the user chooses. The server checks user-entered simulations against per-order, rolling twenty-four-hour, per-market exposure, and concentration limits without proposing the notional.
At the end of the review cycle, sample high, low, blocked, and untouched records. Export journal analytics where useful and ask whether the chosen criteria produced an understandable workload or merely highlighted dramatic price moves. Preserve no-action reasons and missing fields so the queue does not become a winner-only narrative. TEMIRIN supports a traceable review process; users retain responsibility for interpretation, eligibility, capital, and every real Polymarket transaction.
Calibrate the manual triage rubric with concrete examples rather than hidden weights. For one record, a closing deadline may make freshness decisive; for another, a visible public-wallet concentration may justify earlier inspection even when price is quiet. Write the reason beside the selected item and compare it with the eventual disposition. If reviewers repeatedly disagree, simplify the rubric or improve labels instead of claiming that the product has learned an optimal ranking. The queue should make workload choices explainable, not disguise subjective judgment as system intelligence.
Limit concurrent review work to what the named reviewers can actually inspect. Moving dozens of records into an informal “urgent” state weakens ownership and makes stale items harder to spot. A short queue with a written reason, current clock, and responsible person is easier to audit. Carry deferred records forward with their original trigger references intact rather than recreating them to make the list appear fresh.
No. The queue contains watchlist-derived records for review. Freshness, price context, policy state, and visible exposure support human triage rather than a trade recommendation.
It means one or more relevant observations are old or unavailable. Review the source, market, and price timestamps separately before deciding what to do.
User-entered paper orders receive the implemented per-order, rolling twenty-four-hour, per-market exposure, and portfolio concentration checks.
No. Telegram can receive a configured review alert. Approve or reject remains an authenticated in-app action.
